In the late 1980s I received an academic scholarship to become enrolled in the honors program of a small private liberal arts college in Virginia. This honors program consisted of a special curriculum where professors would lecture in their particular area of expertise to a class consisting solely of eight to twenty honors students.
One professor was an expert on the history and study of Eugenics. For those readers who don’t know, Eugenics is both a science and a philosophy that examines the relationship and correlation of genetics in passing on traits from parents to offspring, especially concerning desirable characteristics in humans.
For me, my introduction to Eugenics, it was like the best thing that I had ever heard of, to the dismay of my professor and classmates.
In the history of mankind, Eugenics was being practiced before a written language existed, when human males and females sought to have sex with “attractive” mates, meaning mates that appeared to be the most physically healthy, strong, and likely to produce the best offspring. I acknowledge that there was both a conscious decision and an unconscious biological instinct that was taking place in this example of early human Eugenics.
In the early history of humans, when they began to become farmers and domesticate animals, they soon realized the desirability of selectively breeding the strongest, largest, most healthy male and female livestock to each other, and not breeding unhealthy, weak animals.
Early cultures around the World, and continuing into modern times, have been involved in Eugenics, though it was not called by this name. Vikings, Spartans, and native tribes left newborn infants to die if they showed signs of significant birth defects. European, Asian, African, South American, and North American cultures practiced the custom of “arranged marriages” where the parents deliberated and decided who their children would mate with.
In the 1800s following the American Revolution, the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, rapid advances in science, technology, and medicine, there arose new schools of thought and new sciences such as “Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution”, “psychiatry”, “immunization”, and “Eugenics”.
In the mid-1800s when there was World-wide discussion of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, “natural selection”, “survival of the fittest”, Charles Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton believed that desirable human qualities were hereditary traits, and that the human population could be improved through selective breeding. Francis Galton named this theory/science “Eugenics”. Though keep in mind, the Greek philosopher Plato had written about this in 400 B.C.
While philosophers, politicians, leaders, celebrities, and scholars began trying to convince the World about the benefits of selective breeding in humans, encouraging healthy successful people to breed, and discouraging the breeding of poor inferior people, scientists began researching and experimenting to prove the validity of Eugenics.
Scientists and researchers across the globe began studying the family histories and medical histories of convicted criminals, prison populations, mental patients, mental asylum populations, vagrants, and disabled people in order to discover medical predictors of criminality, mental illness, or feeble-mindedness.
During this time period the terms “idiot” and “moron” were actually clinical medical terminology. The idea that mental illness, criminality, physical deformity, and feeble-mindedness was hereditary and “ran in families” was generally accepted in the early 1900s through the 1950s in the United States. This was widely taught in public elementary and high schools in the U.S. through the famous study of the “Kallikak” and the “Juke” families in Appalachia:
From Wikepedia, The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness was a 1912 book by the American psychologist and eugenicist Henry H. Goddard. Supposedly an extended case study of Goddard’s for the inheritance of “feeble-mindedness”, a general category referring to a variety of mental disabilities including intellectual disability, learning disabilities, and mental illness, ….. Goddard believed that a variety of mental traits were hereditary and that society should limit reproduction by people possessing these traits.
I want to emphasize that prior to World War II, the United States and many other countries around the World had many proponents and advocates for Eugenics, in politics, in universities, in public education systems, in mental health systems, in the medicine, in science, and with the general public.
Immediately after World War II, when it was discovered that Germany had implemented a plan to identify the Jews, remove the Jews from their homes, transport the Jews to concentration camps, and to either exterminate the Jews at the concentration camps or work the Jews to death in the concentration camps, and had succeeded in killing millions of Jews, Eugenics was blamed.
Beginning in the 1950s in the United States, there was a re-examination of Eugenics as discussed, taught, or practiced in politics, universities, public elementary and high schools, mental health systems, public health systems, and the legal system.
Prior to World War II, it was sometimes a normal procedure at mental asylums in the U.S. and other countries to involuntarily sterilize patients. In U.S. court cases, it had been established as lawful, the practice of involuntarily sterilizing feeble-minded mental patients. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote in 1927:
“We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.”
From the end of World War II until the present day, most countries that had once believed in and supported Eugenics, have continually backed away from its beliefs and ideas. Can everyone stop and remember, that Eugenics had been consciously and unconsciously practiced since the beginning of mankind?
Because countries have tried to do a 180 degree change in their beliefs on Eugenics, and perhaps out of a feeling of guilt or to try to make amends, since the 1960s there has been an “anything goes” policy on crime, mental illness, deviant behavior, public education, parental responsibility, illegitimate children, illegal aliens, generations of public welfare recipients.
At this point, there is so much crime, mental illness, drug addiction, deviant behavior, abnormal behavior, dysfunctional adults and children, homelessness, stupid people, illegal aliens, and incompetence, that it seems like right is now wrong, wrong is now right, good is now bad, bad is now good, everything is backwards from the way it used to be.
Some people believe that all of this chaos, destruction, and collapse of once civilized countries has been planned and orchestrated by an elite group of wealthy people in order to crash all governments before a new One World Government/New World Order can be created. This may be true.
One of the ways that we have gotten here, and have ourselves to blame, is letting the feeble-minded, drug addict, criminal, stupid people to breed like rats. Allowed it? We even helped it with liberal public welfare assistance, not keeping criminals in prison, allowing drug addicts to run around on probation, not securing our border, court enforced child support payments to unwed mothers, and letting all these people breed, breed, breed like crazy to where they now make up the majority of the population.
2 thoughts on “The Failure To Accept Eugenics Has Led To The Downfall Of Civilization”
Abortion on demand for the poor is eugenics by another name. It’s in the governments interest to allow uneducated and impoverished people to abort freely and stop flooding the world with swamp rat children.
In reply to Rusty Shackleford,
It was difficult for me to write this first blog post article on Eugenics and stay on track, without stopping to address readers’ concerns about Nazis, white supremacists, racism, abortion, and so forth.
When I was taking this college class on Eugenics, and my professor and classmates saw that I was in favor of Eugenics and involuntary sterilization, in order to try to set me straight, they asked me, “How would you like it if you couldn’t have children?” To which I replied, “Fine with me.”
My father and mother stayed married until death, and had two children, myself and my sister. My parents spent a great deal of time, money, energy, and thought on our education, health care, dental care, recreational activities, vacations, hobbies, school activities, college, career, and adult life difficulties. Always trying to make sure that myself and my sister were O.K. and staying out of trouble.
My parents’ best friends who were more financially successful, Bob & Gloria, they spent just as much or more time, money, energy, effort, and thought on their only son John. Bob & Gloria stayed married until death. They continued to help their only son John, continuing to this day.
My parents’ other best friends, George and Martha Ann, they had two children, and they spent just as much time, money, energy, effort, and thought into their two childrens’ upbringing, and made sure their children were O.K. and not getting into trouble through their adult lives.
Same thing for all of my Aunts & Uncles, and their children, they spent a great deal of time, money, energy, effort, and thought on the one or two children that they had, continuing into when their children were adults.
Myself, my sister, Bob & Gloria’s son John, George and Martha Ann’s son and daughter, all of my cousins, every one of us got at least a bachelor’s degree, most received a master’s degree, one became a medical doctor. None of us ever had a drug or alcohol addiction, though we were introduced to alcohol and marijuana before our teens. None of us has a criminal record of any kind.
Myself and my sister, we never had children. We didn’t want to bring children into this shit World. Bob &
Gloria’s son John had one child. George and Martha Ann’s children did not have children of their own. My best friends and room-mates, Doug F., Steve R., Cameron, these guys never had any children, but they were very competent, intelligent, responsible people.
I explained all of the above, to contrast this to the drug-addict, meth-addict, continually-on-probation people in Dickinson who have kid, after kid, after kid, with different mothers, not only never paying any child support, but doing nothing to educate or raise their children. The most uneducated, lowest intelligence, least responsible, most criminal people in Dickinson have about 4-5 children, versus the medical doctors, dentists, optometrists, engineers, attorneys who average about 1-1.5 children.
Since the rise of liberalism in the 1960s, where “anything goes” and “we need to be tolerant of everything”, the least educated, lowest intelligence, least successful, most criminal, most drug-addicted people have been having 4-5 times the number of children as educated, intelligent, successful people.
Isn’t it obvious at this point, that this can’t continue like this? It can continue if there is going to be a One World Government that is going to treat 90% of the World’s population as dumb live-stock.
LikeLiked by 1 person